Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 63

Thread: nate

  1. #1

    nate

    has anyone heard anything new on nate's health?

























    Go vikes!!

  2. #2

    Re: nate

    I haven't really heard much but he is supposed to play next week thank god

  3. #3

    Re: nate

    yes! we need him to contribute!

























    Go vikes!!

  4. Re: nate

    I think timing was an issue before he injury, and since he hasn't been practicing much, I think it will still be an issue. If he comes back, I would work him in. Let's see how he does in practice this week.

    Sooner he gets back and on the same page as DC the better.

  5. #5

    Re: nate

    "snowinapril" wrote:
    I think timing was an issue before he injury, and since he hasn't been practicing much, I think it will still be an issue. If he comes back, I would work him in. Let's see how he does in practice this week.

    Sooner he gets back and on the same page as DC the better.

    I agree.. I hate rushing people back onto the field.. Just leads to worse things alot of the time.. Let him get ready.. Williamson should be our 2nd WR!

  6. Re: nate

    "Vikez4Lyfe" wrote:
    "snowinapril" wrote:
    I think timing was an issue before he injury, and since he hasn't been practicing much, I think it will still be an issue. If he comes back, I would work him in. Let's see how he does in practice this week.

    Sooner he gets back and on the same page as DC the better.

    I agree.. I hate rushing people back onto the field.. Just leads to worse things alot of the time.. Let him get ready.. Williamson should be our 2nd WR!
    True, we got tons of WRs, there is no reason to have to rush Nate.

    TT, T-Will, K-Rob and M-Rob

    I don't think Rhome will be calling 5 WR sets just yet.

  7. Re: nate

    I would step up M-Robs role this week, he usually does well when motivated. He might have reason to play well against the Bears.

  8. #8

    Re: nate

    man, i realize we have great recievers. just a terrible ol. and oc. thats a shame.

























    Go vikes!!

  9. Re: nate

    Im worried about our defense gettin healthy as well. I hope D-sharp, and B-Will get back into the lineup against chicago....

    Theres NOTHING greater then a Florida Gator!
    "I promise everyone this. When Childress is let go in two years I can honestly say this.
    "I am not surprised"."-PurplePackerEater

  10. Re: nate

    sharper already said he will play and b-will said he is not sure, he has yet to test his knee. He did play with a knee sprain last year in the opener when irvin went down though. chicago is definitely one game where we can get by without our best nickel back

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Nate Clements Anyone????
    By minnesotapride in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 03-02-2007, 05:29 AM
  2. Nate is 24!!!
    By TheAnimal93 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-21-2005, 01:54 AM
  3. Nate Burleson
    By VIKES_1181 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-09-2005, 04:15 AM
  4. Nate Burleson
    By WBLVikeBabe in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 01-09-2005, 11:56 AM
  5. Nate cannot.....
    By VikingsTw in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-24-2004, 07:29 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •