PDA

View Full Version : how would the vikes fare with favre



vikesrock13
08-06-2008, 03:16 PM
the vikes would be
a playoff lock with brett
he is an upgrade to tavaris :o

cogitans
08-06-2008, 03:22 PM
"vikesrock13" wrote:


the vikes would be
a playoff lock with brett
he is an upgrade to tavaris :o
I'd rather have us go 0-16

C Mac D
08-06-2008, 03:56 PM
Probably shouldn't have started a whole new thread about this... there was about 5 of them until they were condensed into one.

The Hammer should be coming around shortly.

jmcdon00
08-06-2008, 03:57 PM
"vikesrock13" wrote:


the vikes would be
a playoff lock with brett
he is an upgrade to tavaris :o

hmm, never thought about what would happen if Favre came to the Vikings, very interesting idea.

Purple Floyd
08-06-2008, 03:57 PM
Tarvaris is a far better QB than that old washed up, grizzled GB castoff.

veence
08-06-2008, 03:59 PM
2 terms that should never be used in conjunction with each other: Favre-Vikings. I don't want Mrs. Madden anywhere near Winter Park.

WisconsinSucks
08-06-2008, 04:04 PM
Who's Farve?

StillPurple
08-06-2008, 04:14 PM
Short answer: we would win the NFC North (but we will do that already without him) and then he would blow us up in the playoffs by throwing INTs and refusing to just "drive the bus". Go back and watch Favre's playoff performances in his career and how many times he blew that team up. Watch the Packers-Rams game of about 5 years ago, when he threw like 6 INTs.

I hate to say it, but I prefer Tarvaris to Favre. Reason: T-Jacks is more team-oriented and less egotistical. Favre is "the Paris Hilton of the NFL".

There would be more spectacular play with Favre, but I just don't want him here.

i_bleed_purple
08-06-2008, 04:15 PM
"StillPurple" wrote:


Short answer: we would win the NFC North (but we will do that already without him) and then he would blow us up in the playoffs by throwing INTs and refusing to just "drive the bus".

I hate to say it, but I prefer Tarvaris to Favre. Reason: T-Jacks is more team-oriented and less egotistical. Favre is "the Paris Hilton of the NFL".

There would be more spectacular play with Favre, but I just don't want him here.





:O:O:O Shocking!!! StillPurple prefers TJ!!!

StillPurple
08-06-2008, 04:16 PM
Yes, I do. I love T-Jacks, compared to Favre.

Don't get me wrong, I think T-Jacks can and could blow us up too, but it is less likely, because Favre has done that like 12 times to his team already. At least when our QB sucks, we don't blame the receiver and say "he didn't run under the ball".
::)

cogitans
08-06-2008, 04:18 PM
"StillPurple" wrote:


Yes, I do. I love T-Jacks, compared to Favre.
What does that say. It's like comparing a steak dinner to eating dogshit

midgensa
08-06-2008, 04:23 PM
What a unique thread! And by the way ... it is TARVARIS.

StillPurple
08-06-2008, 04:30 PM
Don't memorize his name. He might not be our starter for that long... :P

C Mac D
08-06-2008, 04:31 PM
"cogitans" wrote:


"StillPurple" wrote:


Yes, I do. I love T-Jacks, compared to Favre.
What does that say. It's like comparing a steak dinner to eating dogshit


Underrated cuisine actually...

cogitans
08-06-2008, 04:41 PM
"C" wrote:


"cogitans" wrote:


"StillPurple" wrote:


Yes, I do. I love T-Jacks, compared to Favre.
What does that say. It's like comparing a steak dinner to eating dogshit


Underrated cuisine actually...
Probably varied and full of left over proteins.