PDA

View Full Version : Vote....



smootpepper
09-13-2005, 01:59 AM
http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/sportsnation/story?page=2005nflheadcoachapproval


Head coach approval rating.

akvikefan89
09-13-2005, 02:10 AM
oh please no. :lol:

cc21
09-13-2005, 02:13 AM
I approved Tice. The turnovers werent his fault.

V4L
09-13-2005, 02:15 AM
I approve Tice.. I don't approve Loney!

magicci
09-13-2005, 02:18 AM
our O is ranked 11 and our D is ranked 20

vikes09
09-13-2005, 02:22 AM
forget poles, i know that our defense is way better than 20th and our offense will bring it together and make a nice comeback next week. our defense was friggin sweet!

Webby
09-13-2005, 02:24 AM
:roll:

V4L
09-13-2005, 02:26 AM
"webmaster" wrote:

:roll:


:roll: :roll:

magicci
09-13-2005, 02:27 AM
if our O was ranked 11th then that makes the bucs D number 21 and if our D was ranked 20th then that makes tampas O 12? so then we had a better O and D then them and we still lossed?

magicci
09-13-2005, 02:32 AM
but this is kinda confusing. you would think with those stats, what i said is true but its not cuz if the bucs O was really number 2 then shouldnt our D be number 31? and if their D was 5 shouldnt our O be 27th?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/snation/coaches?coachId=14

shockzilla
09-13-2005, 02:44 AM
Give me a break. :roll:

Judging the job head coaches are doing after ONE FRICKIN' GAME???????

smootpepper
09-13-2005, 02:48 AM
"shockzilla" wrote:

Give me a break. :roll:

Judging the job head coaches are doing after ONE FRICKIN' GAME???????

Vote after every game, it tracks how the approval rating changes after each game and will give a season average.

slowlow
09-13-2005, 05:18 AM
"Vikez4Lyfe" wrote:

"webmaster" wrote:

:roll:


:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

ultravikingfan
09-13-2005, 05:26 AM
"slowlow" wrote:

"Vikez4Lyfe" wrote:

"webmaster" wrote:

:roll:


:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:


:roll: x 10!

muchluv4smoot
09-13-2005, 05:33 AM
"ultravikingfan" wrote:

"slowlow" wrote:

"Vikez4Lyfe" wrote:

"webmaster" wrote:

:roll:


:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:


:roll: x 10!


:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

mnvikes61
09-13-2005, 05:34 AM
"muchluv4smoot" wrote:

:roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll:
:lol: that's almost hypnotic

muchluv4smoot
09-13-2005, 05:37 AM
"magicci" wrote:

our O is ranked 11 and our D is ranked 20


Defensive rankings go strictly by yards. It is a little skewed since our offense kept turing the ball over, or going 3 and out, and our D was always on the field. Man it feels weird saying that about our offense.

Also, take away that 71 yard TD run by cadillac, or just give him a couple yards or so on that run(since 2 yards or 71 yards didn't matter to our D on that play, both would have resulted in a loss for our team) and we would have ranked pretty darn high.


Our D is gonna be ranked around 10 or so this year IMO.

mnjamie
09-13-2005, 05:54 AM
"muchluv4smoot" wrote:

"magicci" wrote:

our O is ranked 11 and our D is ranked 20


Defensive rankings go strictly by yards. It is a little skewed since our offense kept turing the ball over, or going 3 and out, and our D was always on the field. Man it feels weird saying that about our offense.

Also, take away that 71 yard TD run by cadillac, or just give him a couple yards or so on that run(since 2 yards or 71 yards didn't matter to our D on that play, both would have resulted in a loss for our team) and we would have ranked pretty darn high.


Our D is gonna be ranked around 10 or so this year IMO.


Loved how Caddy was getting all this praise today ... He pops a long one on 3rd and 1 at the end of the game when the Vikes sell out to try and get the ball back ... and all of a sudden i'm hearing comparisons to Emmit Smith ... Give me a break !!! :pukeright:

muchluv4smoot
09-13-2005, 05:57 AM
"mnjamie" wrote:

"muchluv4smoot" wrote:

"magicci" wrote:

our O is ranked 11 and our D is ranked 20


Defensive rankings go strictly by yards. It is a little skewed since our offense kept turing the ball over, or going 3 and out, and our D was always on the field. Man it feels weird saying that about our offense.

Also, take away that 71 yard TD run by cadillac, or just give him a couple yards or so on that run(since 2 yards or 71 yards didn't matter to our D on that play, both would have resulted in a loss for our team) and we would have ranked pretty darn high.


Our D is gonna be ranked around 10 or so this year IMO.


Loved how Caddy was getting all this praise today ... He pops a long one on 3rd and 1 at the end of the game when the Vikes sell out to try and get the ball back ... and all of a sudden i'm hearing comparisons to Emmit Smith ... Give me a break !!! :pukeright:


Yeah, now that I know that we lost, I wish we would have played normal D there and let him get his 2 or 3 yards and end the game with 80 yards on 27 carries. In my mind that is what he got and our D only gave up 280 yards, not 340ish. Those other yards were meaningless to us/me.

vikes09
09-14-2005, 02:52 AM
fat pat played really well, but kevin williams name wasnt called as much. same with antione but thats cause he shut down his man. and what a nice INT by smoot.

Ltrey33
09-14-2005, 02:57 AM
"coreychavous21" wrote:

I approved Tice. The turnovers werent his fault.

I don't. We looked unprepared and totally out of our wits. That falls on the HC to me.

Lotza
09-14-2005, 03:00 AM
i approved tice

snowinapril
09-14-2005, 03:00 AM
I honestly can't vote at this time. We haven't given him or DC time to work this season. I have voiced my concerns in other posts about him but it is premature. I will vote in a few weeks.

He actually wore a jacket to the press conference yesterday so if I had to vote (with a gun to my head, since he wore the jacket) I would vote approve. The jacket makes up for all of the Turnovers, I actually feel happy about the turnovers seeing that jacket. It was a wonderful shade of blue. It also looked very comfortable for a jacket.