PDA

View Full Version : good article bout new d



magicci
03-28-2005, 08:30 PM
http://profootballweekly.com/PFW/Commentary/Columns/2005/reynolds032805.htm
its pretty good check it out i dont think its been poster anywhere else

TheAnimal93
03-28-2005, 08:53 PM
Thats a good read!
The defense looks good to me. I can see EJ learning a great deal this year and I am sure that he wants to be out there full time, so we will see.

Nice new avatar!
:headbang:

muchluv4smoot
03-28-2005, 10:45 PM
Still looking at a couple WILL LB's. I bet they are polley in FA and DJ in the draft.

I hope to god we can get williams at 7, but DJ would make our D pretty scary. But I like DT and think he is gonna have a very good year this year too.

thepacksux
03-28-2005, 11:00 PM
DT is going to be very good if he can get the mental aspect down, he has blazin speed for a lb and can hit hard.

nareg
03-28-2005, 11:18 PM
:cool: very true DT is very quick player but he loses focus to easily, but this year i think he'll step up with all the newer and smarter players around him to helphttp://www.photofile.com/Photos/Albums/Whats_Hot_Page/NFL/Portrait_Plus/Images/03CulpepperDauntePPlus.jpg

cajunvike
03-28-2005, 11:29 PM
That article is right on point...veteran strength up the middle and young, aggressive speed on the outsides...a great formula for an awesome D...let's hope that it translates onto the playing field...if so, we WILL have a top 10 D!!!

vikes09
03-28-2005, 11:37 PM
im hoping for a #1 defense!!!

GreenBaySlackers
03-28-2005, 11:38 PM
for some reason i cant view it, will someone post it for me? thanks

hellzbellz
03-28-2005, 11:39 PM
And what seemed like one small step — dealing Moss — may lead to a giant leap in Minnesota.

Leading all the way the SUPERBOWL :cheers:

vikes09
03-28-2005, 11:59 PM
When Neil Armstrong first landed on the moon in 1969, few Americans understood the complete depth of the accomplishment.

There was reason to be excited, sure, but until subsequent exploratory research missions yielded scientific incentive to forge forward with a billion-dollar space program, it was difficult to grasp the paradigm.

Which is exactly how Vikings fans have felt for the last decade, give or take a few seasons. Left for years wondering what in the name of Keith Millard it would take to field a reasonably effective defense to complement one of the league’s most accomplished offenses, the paradigm shift finally was set in motion with the dismissal — for official NFL bookkeeping purposes, you can call it a trade — of All-Pro WR Randy Moss March 4.

Moss heading to Oakland didn’t free cap space or permit the Vikings to pursue five new defensive starters. Moss’ lack of leadership and his unbearable locker room undertow forced the Vikings to make dramatic changes. Head coach Mike Tice told coaches and personnel in an early February meeting that the team would be hard-pressed to advance or improve beyond the status quo — challenging for the division, not the Super Bowl — without altering its leadership structure and chemistry. Moss, who the Vikings strongly considered trading in March 2004, was the team’s most talented player and also its most significant roadblock.

Jettisoning Moss will deflate the offense in some ways. But Tice is willing to give something up to get defensive coordinator Ted Cottrell one thing: balance. More than $23 million in salary-cap space later, the Vikings have assembled the personnel to build a top-10 defense.

“We saw a couple of things,� Cottrell said of a potential defensive resurrection in Minnesota, speaking from his office before joining his family for Good Friday festivities. “Leadership of the defense was lacking, especially veteran leadership. And we wanted to become more consistent at the positions we targeted — tackle alongside Kevin Williams, at middle linebacker and at corner and free safety.�

Two years ago, the Vikings entered free agency with some trepidation. One offensive lineman and a lot of defense topped the shopping list. The Vikings lured ORT Mike Rosenthal from the Giants and then surveyed the free-agent landscape. Tice and the scouting staff agreed then-Raiders CB Tory James should be the top target. Passively, they welcomed a series of cornerbacks to their Eden Prairie facility before the Bengals snuck under the radar and beat the Vikings’ offer to James by less than $1.77 million over four years. Minnesota ended up signing, out of need, Denard Walker, and the defense remained rotten without a No. 1 cornerback. James has played at a high level for two years, going to the Pro Bowl in 2004, while Walker was cut and signed as a third corner last season with Oakland.

“We talked about it, but we knew we wanted to be in it early in the free-agency signing period,� Cottrell said. “We wanted to answer the questions. Take care of the problems.�

Former Redskins MLB Antonio Pierce was the only free agent the Vikings entertained this offseason who chose a destination other than Minnesota. Pierce opted to sign a $26 million contract with the Giants after meeting with the Vikings on the first day of free agency.

“The guys we targeted are the guys we went after and got them,� Cottrell said. “We got our top choices at all of those (positions).�

Cottrell had plenty of sway in the Vikings’ pursuit of three of his former pupils. Last season, Minnesota stole Antoine Winfield from the Jets during a wine-and-dine visit. Winfield played for Cottrell in Buffalo and voiced his support when Cottrell suggested NT Pat Williams could be one of the first targets targeted. Adams, 32, signed 12 hours after free agency opened. Then Cottrell helped bring in LB Sam Cowart, another former Bill, in a trade with the Jets. In between, CB Fred Smoot and FS Darren Sharper had signed on and joined SLB Napoleon Harris, part of the Moss trade, to give Minnesota five new starters on defense — and more firepower than Vikings fans have seen since the first lunar landing in 1969. Oh, Bud Grant coached that team to a 12-2 record and a trip to the Super Bowl by giving up 14 points or less in 13 straight games.

“I can’t say that will be our identity,� Cottrell said of the new-look defense. “But we’re going to be much better. People are going to have to work to find holes, to find a way to attack against us.�

The LB corps was a glaring weakness a year ago. Chris Claiborne had a second uneven season and left for St. Louis in free agency while the Vikings held the door open for his departure. Claiborne brought some versatility, playing all three LB spots in his two years with the team, but he was injury-prone and disrupted the continuity of the defense. MLB E.J. Henderson, a second-round pick in 2003, replaced Greg Biekert inside and was as lost as he looked. Cottrell rolled back the complexity of the scheme but it didn’t prevent Henderson from blowing assignments and missing tackles. Henderson, who turns 25 in August, isn’t a lost cause. But he will open training camp behind second-year LB Dontarrious Thomas, Harris and Cowart on the depth chart.

“We’re still looking at a couple of players at “Will� linebacker,� Cottrell said. “But with the two we added, and we still think we can bring Keith Newman back at the strong side, we are greatly improved.�

The core of the defense was the emphasis for Cottrell, harping on Tice and management that the team needed more bulk inside and to get better up the middle. Fred Robbins (2003), Chris Hovan and Spencer Johnson (2004) all had tried and failed to complement the closest thing the Vikings had to a blue-chip defensive tackle, Kevin Williams. Adding Pat Williams, who Cottrell believes will draw two blockers on 70 percent of the snaps he plays, was a major boon. Stealing Cowart and Sharper, released by the rival Packers and signed two days later, gives the Vikings six defensive players who have been to the Pro Bowl.

“We didn’t want people running the ball down our throats,� Cottrell said. “We like our speed on the outside, our corners can tackle, but we needed to be more stout inside. Part of that is Pat, but you have to be solid all the way through to your (safety).�

SS Corey Chavous returns from an elbow injury and will be “completely interchangeable� with Sharper, according to Cottrell. The Vikings were prone to big plays because of a lack of depth at cornerback and range at safety, but that problem would appear to be solved as well. The Vikings had no intention of signing Smoot and had focused on other cornerbacks on the market in anticipation of Smoot re-signing with the Redskins. But upon further investigation, Smoot made perfect sense. Like Sharper, he more or less fell into the lap of the Vikings.

Cottrell said he isn’t sure that Minnesota has stowed away its checkbook with free agency dialing down to second-tier and complementary players. The Vikings are looking for bargains now, with their focus on the draft, but plan to keep shopping.
Tice has told anyone who will listen that the Vikings aren’t locked into any one position (a wide receiver perhaps?) with the seventh overall pick in the draft. For what it’s worth, Cottrell said he could see the Vikings finding another playmaker on defense in the first round, be it with the No. 7 pick or the 18th.

And what seemed like one small step — dealing Moss — may lead to a giant leap in Minnesota.

IbleedPURPLEandGOLD
03-29-2005, 01:03 AM
Good Read. Lets go vikings...i cant wait

iluvbigtds
03-29-2005, 01:12 AM
I really think with a decent draft, which means MW/DJ and a stud DE or maybe Thomas Davis at 18 and Brown/Baas in the 2nd, we really have the potential to be top 10 in both offense and defense.

NordicNed
03-29-2005, 01:48 AM
Dam Right,,,,,,,,This is our year people,,,,,,You can Bank on it.....

Articnv
03-29-2005, 02:26 AM
It all depends on how well our defnse gells and if theres any attidude problems. If we gel early were going to be threat. if gel late we may be in trouble. With out moss and so far no kicker we will need the defnse to do make the other team do more 3 and outs or get more turn overs. So we have the opirtunity to score more.

briboy75
03-29-2005, 02:36 AM
"VikingNed" wrote:

Dam Right,,,,,,,,This is our year people,,,,,,You can Bank on it.....

I'm so sick of people predicting we win the superbowl before the preseason even starts. Happens every single year. Yeah the defensive changes are encouraging. I hope for the best.

ultravikingfan
03-29-2005, 02:46 AM
"briboy75" wrote:

"VikingNed" wrote:

Dam Right,,,,,,,,This is our year people,,,,,,You can Bank on it.....

I'm so sick of people predicting we win the superbowl before the preseason even starts. Happens every single year. Yeah the defensive changes are encouraging. I hope for the best.

One of these years we will, then everybody will say, "I told you so"! :lol:

vikes09
03-29-2005, 03:00 AM
hey briboy, at least they arent griping about how bad we are going to be!!! its good to be optimistic, maybe this time we wont be let down. :cool:

napman58
03-29-2005, 03:25 AM
i didnt think we would get sharper!

napman58
03-29-2005, 03:26 AM
any 1 think we got what it takes?

jackyl
03-29-2005, 03:30 AM
"napman58" wrote:

any 1 think we got what it takes?

Welcome napman. I think the Vikes have what it takes on D for a change. I think the ? right now is whether or not the offense is potent enough yet.

vikes09
03-29-2005, 04:42 AM
i think it all depends on our oline. if they play really well than i think our running and passing game will be good enough, and w/ all our turnovers on defense we wont HAVE to score every possesion.

GreenBaySlackers
03-29-2005, 04:49 AM
thanks for posting it vikes09

vikes09
03-29-2005, 04:59 AM
your welcome. it is a very good and diffrent view about the new defense.

snowinapril
03-29-2005, 04:59 AM
"briboy75" wrote:

"VikingNed" wrote:

Dam Right,,,,,,,,This is our year people,,,,,,You can Bank on it.....

I'm so sick of people predicting we win the superbowl before the preseason even starts. Happens every single year. Yeah the defensive changes are encouraging. I hope for the best.

There is nothing wrong with enthusiasm.

But, I think the realality is the first year is to concentrate on the first eight games and get better. Play the division games tough. Go into the last half of the season with some determination to win out the last eight games. I think it will take some time, 4-6 games for our D to get to full force. I hope we stay healthy this year. Main thing is to make sure we win the DIVISION GAMES. Good luck Vikes.

vikes09
03-29-2005, 05:02 AM
good point snow. its just so exciting. its not even the draft and our team looks very solid.

DaunteHOF
03-29-2005, 05:04 AM
Good article, finally getting some respect...

vikes09
03-29-2005, 05:06 AM
thats what i was thinking.

DefensivePlaymaker
03-29-2005, 06:34 AM
"Articnv" wrote:

It all depends on how well our defnse gells and if theres any attidude problems. If we gel early were going to be threat. if gel late we may be in trouble. With out moss and so far no kicker we will need the defnse to do make the other team do more 3 and outs or get more turn overs. So we have the opirtunity to score more.

if we can get mike williams and mike nugent in the draft, we'll be okay.

DefensivePlaymaker
03-29-2005, 06:51 AM
"vikes09" wrote:

good point snow. its just so exciting. its not even the draft and our team looks very solid.

yeah, it looks solid with the exception of kicker, LE, and it'd be good to add another receiver.

vikes09
03-30-2005, 12:44 AM
of course, any team could use a pass rushing end.

PurplePackerEater
03-30-2005, 01:15 AM
Not to rain on everyone's parade, but here's a reality check. Until the draft and preseason I agree with most of this article. I don't consider myself "negetive", I consider myself a "realist" and I prefer to stay focused and not let my guard down. Most of you act like we've already won the Super Bowl!



http://vikings.foxsports.scout.com/2/364436.html?refid=400

PurpleElf
03-30-2005, 01:17 AM
I just hope the defense meshes quickly, I dont forsee a big problem with all the veterans.

now all we need is M. Williams #7, E.James #18 and Nugent in the second and were set. This might be setting myself up for disapointment but I just dont care. I got plenty of purple left to bleed.